<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>YourSecuritiesArbitrationLawyer.com &#187; Brokers &amp; Brokerage Firms In The News</title>
	<atom:link href="http://yoursecuritiesarbitrationlawyer.com/category/securities-investments-stock-brokers-in-the-news/brokers-brokerage-firms-in-the-news/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://yoursecuritiesarbitrationlawyer.com</link>
	<description>Securities Arbitration Lawyers &#38; Stock Broker Fraud Attorneys Dedicated To Helping Investors Recover Securities &#38; Investment Losses.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Oct 2010 03:34:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Merrill Lynch To Pay $2.5 Million For Allegedly Failing To Provide Unit Investment Trust UIT Sales Charge Discounts</title>
		<link>http://yoursecuritiesarbitrationlawyer.com/merrill-lynch-to-pay-2-5-million-for-allegedly-failing-to-provide-unit-investment-trust-uit-sales-charge-discounts/</link>
		<comments>http://yoursecuritiesarbitrationlawyer.com/merrill-lynch-to-pay-2-5-million-for-allegedly-failing-to-provide-unit-investment-trust-uit-sales-charge-discounts/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Oct 2010 03:34:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Brokers & Brokerage Firms In The News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[arbitration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[arbitrations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[attorney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[attorneys]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[breakpoint discount]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[breakpoint discounts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[broker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[brokerage firm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[brokers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[claim]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[claims]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[complaint]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[complaints]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[compliants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[discount]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[discounts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[financial advisor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[financial advisors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Financial Industry Regulatory Authority]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fined]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lawsuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lawsuits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lawyer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lawyers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[litigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Merrill Lynch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Merrill Lynch Pierce Fenner & Smith]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rollover and exchange discount]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rollover and exchange discounts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sales charge discount]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sales charge discounts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stock broker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stock brokers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stockbroker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stockbrokers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UIT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UITs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unit Investment Trust]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unit Investment Trusts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://yoursecuritiesarbitrationlawyer.com/?p=1089</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Merrill Lynch Agrees To Pay $2.5 Million To Settle Alleged Failures To Provide Sales Charge Discounts On Unit Investment Trust UIT Purchases. The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) has issued an order imposing fines of $500,000 on Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner, &#38; Smith (&#8220;Merrill Lynch&#8221; or &#8220;Merrill&#8221; or &#8220;Respondent&#8221;) for allegedly failing to provide sales charge [...]<p><a href="http://yoursecuritiesarbitrationlawyer.com/merrill-lynch-to-pay-2-5-million-for-allegedly-failing-to-provide-unit-investment-trust-uit-sales-charge-discounts/">Merrill Lynch To Pay $2.5 Million For Allegedly Failing To Provide Unit Investment Trust UIT Sales Charge Discounts</a> is a post from: <a href="http://yoursecuritiesarbitrationlawyer.com">YourSecuritiesArbitrationLawyer.com</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p><span style="color: #ff0000;"><strong>Merrill Lynch Agrees To Pay $2.5 Million To Settle </strong><strong>Alleged Failures To Provide Sales Charge Discounts On Unit Investment Trust UIT Purchases.</strong></span></p>
<p>The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) has issued an order imposing fines of $500,000 on Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner, &amp; Smith (&#8220;Merrill Lynch&#8221; or &#8220;Merrill&#8221; or &#8220;Respondent&#8221;) for allegedly failing to provide sales charge discounts (such as &#8221;breakpoint discounts&#8221; and &#8220;rollover and exchange discounts) to Merrill Lynch customers on certain Unit Investment Trust UIT purchases, according to an August 18, 2010 FINRA securities &amp; investment regulatory press release.   Merrill Lynch will reportedly pay $2 million to compensate affected Unit Investment Trust UIT customers.</p>
<p>According to FINRA, between October 2006 and June 2008, Merrill Lynch failed to appropriately apply discounts on rollover and breakpoint purchases resulting in Merrill Lynch customers being overcharged on their Unit Investment Trust UIT purchases.</p>
<p>In settling this matter, Merrill Lynch neither admitted nor denied the charges, but consented to the entry of FINRA&#8217;s findings.</p>
<p><strong><span style="color: #ff0000;">If You Lost Money In A Merrill Lynch Unit Investment Trust Or Other Investment and Believe Merrill Lynch </span></strong><strong><span style="color: #ff0000;">May Be To Blame For Your Losses, Contact A Securities Arbitration Attorney and Broker Fraud Lawyer:</span><br />
</strong></p>
<p><strong><a title="Report &amp; Recover Merrill Lynch Investment or Brokerage Account Losses" href="http://yoursecuritiesarbitrationlawyer.com/report-your-broker/" target="_self">-Recover Merrill Lynch Brokerage Account Losses-</a></strong></p>
<p><span style="color: #808000;">Fill Out The Form On The Right For A Free Attorney Review.</span></p>
<p><span style="color: #999999;">If You Have Thoughts A<span style="color: #999999;">bout<span style="color: #999999;"> Merrill Lynch</span></span></span><span style="color: #999999;">, Share Your Merrill Lynch Securities &amp; Investment Comments With Others Below.</span></p>
<p><a href="http://yoursecuritiesarbitrationlawyer.com/merrill-lynch-to-pay-2-5-million-for-allegedly-failing-to-provide-unit-investment-trust-uit-sales-charge-discounts/">Merrill Lynch To Pay $2.5 Million For Allegedly Failing To Provide Unit Investment Trust UIT Sales Charge Discounts</a> is a post from: <a href="http://yoursecuritiesarbitrationlawyer.com">YourSecuritiesArbitrationLawyer.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://yoursecuritiesarbitrationlawyer.com/merrill-lynch-to-pay-2-5-million-for-allegedly-failing-to-provide-unit-investment-trust-uit-sales-charge-discounts/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Morgan Stanley Censured and Fined $800,000 For Alleged Deficient Conflict of Interest Disclosures in Equity Research Reports and Public Appearances by Research Analysts</title>
		<link>http://yoursecuritiesarbitrationlawyer.com/morgan-stanley-censured-and-fined-800000-for-alleged-deficient-conflict-of-interest-disclosures-in-equity-research-reports-and-public-appearances-by-research-analysts/</link>
		<comments>http://yoursecuritiesarbitrationlawyer.com/morgan-stanley-censured-and-fined-800000-for-alleged-deficient-conflict-of-interest-disclosures-in-equity-research-reports-and-public-appearances-by-research-analysts/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Aug 2010 21:30:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Brokers & Brokerage Firms In The News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2003 Research Analyst Settlement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[account statement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[account statements]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[analyst]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[analysts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[arbitration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[arbitrations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[attorney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[attorneys]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[broker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[brokerage account statement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[brokerage account statements]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[brokerage firm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[brokers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[claim]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[claims]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[complaint]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[complaints]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conflict of interest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conflicts of interest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[disclosure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[disclosures]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[equity research report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[equity research reports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[independent research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[investment banking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lawsuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lawsuits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lawyer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lawyers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[market maker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[market making]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[morgan stanley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Morgan Stanley & Co.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Morgan Stanley & Co. Inc.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[price target]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[price targets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public offering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[research analyst]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[research analysts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[revenue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[securities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[securities arbitration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[settle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[settlement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stock brokers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stockbrokers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[third-party research]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://yoursecuritiesarbitrationlawyer.com/?p=1075</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Morgan Stanley Ordered To Pay $800,000 By FINRA for Allegedly Failing To Disclose Certain Information About the Relationships Morgan Stanley, or its Analysts, Had With Companies Covered in its Research Reports and The Availability of Independent Research in Customer Account Statements. The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) has issued an order censuring and imposing fines [...]<p><a href="http://yoursecuritiesarbitrationlawyer.com/morgan-stanley-censured-and-fined-800000-for-alleged-deficient-conflict-of-interest-disclosures-in-equity-research-reports-and-public-appearances-by-research-analysts/">Morgan Stanley Censured and Fined $800,000 For Alleged Deficient Conflict of Interest Disclosures in Equity Research Reports and Public Appearances by Research Analysts</a> is a post from: <a href="http://yoursecuritiesarbitrationlawyer.com">YourSecuritiesArbitrationLawyer.com</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p><span style="color: #ff0000;"><strong>Morgan Stanley Ordered To Pay $800,000 By  FINRA</strong><strong> for Allegedly Failing To D<span style="color: #ff0000;">isclose</span></strong></span><strong><span style="color: #ff0000;"> Certain Information About the Relationships Morgan Stanley, or its Analysts, Had With Companies Covered in its Research Reports and The Availability of Independent Research in Customer Account Statements.</span></strong></p>
<p>The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) has issued an order censuring and imposing fines on Morgan Stanley &amp; Co., Inc.  in the amount of $800,000 to settle charges relating to Morgan Stanley&#8217;s alleged failure to make public disclosures required by FINRA&#8217;s rules governing research analyst conflicts of interest and failure to comply with the 2003 Research Analyst Settlement requiring firms disclose the availability of independent research in  broker customer account statements, according to an August 10, 2010 FINRA securities &amp; investment  regulatory press release.</p>
<p>FINRA reportedly found that from April 2006 to June 2010, Morgan Stanley issued  equity research reports that failed to disclose accurate information  about the relationships Morgan Stanley, or its analysts, had with  companies covered in its research reports, representing approximately 6,836 deficient disclosures in about 6,632 equity research reports and 84 public appearances by research analysts, including the following alleged deficient disclosures:</p>
<ul>
<li>Securities holdings of an analyst, or a member of the analyst&#8217;s household, in a subject company;</li>
<li>Morgan Stanley&#8217;s receipt of investment banking and non-investment banking revenue from subject companies;</li>
<li>Morgan Stanley&#8217;s role as a manager, or co-manager, of a public offering of securities for subject companies;</li>
<li>Morgan Stanley&#8217;s role as a market maker for certain subject companies&#8217; securities; and</li>
<li>Price charts for securities covered in equity research reports and the valuation method used to support published price targets.</li>
</ul>
<p>According to <a title="Morgan Stanley Letter of Acceptance, Waiver and Consent" href="http://www.finra.org/web/groups/industry/@ip/@enf/@ad/documents/industry/p121898.pdf" target="_blank">FINRA</a>, Morgan Stanley also did not disclose in approximately 127,600 monthly Morgan Stanley brokerage  account statements sent to Morgan Stanley customers from August 2007 to February 2008  that it had available independent, third-party research.</p>
<p>In settling this matter, Morgan Stanley neither admitted nor denied the    charges, but consented to the entry of FINRA&#8217;s findings.</p>
<p><strong><span style="color: #ff0000;">If  You Lost Money In Any Morgan Stanley Investment or Brokerage Account and Believe Morgan Stanley </span></strong><strong><span style="color: #ff0000;">May Be To  Blame For Your Losses, Contact A Securities Arbitration Attorney and Broker Fraud Lawyer:</span><br />
</strong></p>
<p><strong><a title="Report &amp; Recover Morgan Stanley Investment or Brokerage Account Losses" href="http://yoursecuritiesarbitrationlawyer.com/report-your-broker/" target="_self">-Recover Morgan Stanley Brokerage Account Losses-</a></strong></p>
<p><span style="color: #808000;">Fill  Out  The Form On The Right For A Free Attorney Review.</span></p>
<p><span style="color: #999999;">If You Have Thoughts A<span style="color: #999999;">bout<span style="color: #999999;"> </span></span></span><span style="color: #999999;">Morgan Stanley, Share YourMorgan Stanley<strong> </strong>Securities &amp; Investment Comments With Others Below.</span></p>
<p><a href="http://yoursecuritiesarbitrationlawyer.com/morgan-stanley-censured-and-fined-800000-for-alleged-deficient-conflict-of-interest-disclosures-in-equity-research-reports-and-public-appearances-by-research-analysts/">Morgan Stanley Censured and Fined $800,000 For Alleged Deficient Conflict of Interest Disclosures in Equity Research Reports and Public Appearances by Research Analysts</a> is a post from: <a href="http://yoursecuritiesarbitrationlawyer.com">YourSecuritiesArbitrationLawyer.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://yoursecuritiesarbitrationlawyer.com/morgan-stanley-censured-and-fined-800000-for-alleged-deficient-conflict-of-interest-disclosures-in-equity-research-reports-and-public-appearances-by-research-analysts/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>SunTrust Investment Services Ordered To Pay $1.4 Million For Alleged Unsuitable Closed-End Fund and Mutual Fund Transactions</title>
		<link>http://yoursecuritiesarbitrationlawyer.com/suntrust-investment-services-ordered-to-pay-1-4-million-for-alleged-unsuitable-closed-end-fund-and-mutual-fund-transactions/</link>
		<comments>http://yoursecuritiesarbitrationlawyer.com/suntrust-investment-services-ordered-to-pay-1-4-million-for-alleged-unsuitable-closed-end-fund-and-mutual-fund-transactions/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Aug 2010 21:07:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Brokers & Brokerage Firms In The News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[arbitration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[attorney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[attorneys]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[broker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[broker commission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[broker commissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[brokerage firm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[brokers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[buying]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[claim]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[claims]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Closed End]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Closed-End Fund]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Closed-End Mutual Fund]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[commission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[commissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[complaints]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[compliants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lawsuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lawyer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lawyers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[losses]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[maximum sales charge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[maximum sales charge discount]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mutual fund]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mutual funds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[recommend]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[recommendation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[recommended]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[recommends]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sales charge discount]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sales load]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sales load fee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sales load fees]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sales loads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[securities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[selling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[short term trading]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[short-term]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stock broker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stock brokers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stockbroker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stockbrokers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sun Trust]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SunTrust]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SunTrust Investment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SunTrust Investment Services]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SunTrust Investment Services Inc.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[supervise]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[supervising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trading]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UIT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unit Investment Trust]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unit Investment Trusts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unsuitable]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://yoursecuritiesarbitrationlawyer.com/?p=1071</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[SunTrust Investment Services Ordered To Pay $1.4 Million By FINRA for Alleged Unsuitable Unit Investment Trust (UIT), Closed-End Fund (CEF) and Mutual Fund Transactions. The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) has issued an order imposing fines on SunTrust Investment Services, Inc.  in the amount of $1.44 million to resolve charges related to unsuitable unit investment [...]<p><a href="http://yoursecuritiesarbitrationlawyer.com/suntrust-investment-services-ordered-to-pay-1-4-million-for-alleged-unsuitable-closed-end-fund-and-mutual-fund-transactions/">SunTrust Investment Services Ordered To Pay $1.4 Million For Alleged Unsuitable Closed-End Fund and Mutual Fund Transactions</a> is a post from: <a href="http://yoursecuritiesarbitrationlawyer.com">YourSecuritiesArbitrationLawyer.com</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p><span style="color: #ff0000;"><strong>SunTrust Investment Services Ordered To Pay $1.4 Million By  FINRA</strong><strong> for Alleged Unsuitable Unit Investment Trust (UIT), Closed-End Fund (CEF) and Mutual Fund Transactions.</strong></span><strong></strong></p>
<p>The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) has issued an order imposing fines on SunTrust Investment Services, Inc.  in the amount of $1.44 million to resolve charges related to unsuitable unit investment  trust (UIT), closed-end fund (CEF) and mutual fund transactions, according to a July 22, 2010 FINRA securities &amp; investment  regulatory press release.  $900,000 reportely represents a fine that includes $224,000 in disgorgement of broker commissions earned on the alleged unsuitable trades while $540,000  represents restitution to certain customers who allegedly incurred brokerage account losses.</p>
<p>According to <a title="SunTrust Investment Services Letter of Acceptance, Waiver and Consent" href="http://www.finra.org/web/groups/industry/@ip/@enf/@ad/documents/industry/p121752.pdf" target="_blank">FINRA</a>, SunTrust Investment Services engaged in 294 unsuitable short-term Unit Investment Trust (&#8220;UIT&#8221;), Closed-End Fund (&#8220;CEF&#8221;) and mutual fund transactions in certain customer accounts that allegedly involved recommending a short-term trading strategy of buying and selling Unit Investment Trusts and Closed-End Funds less than a year after purchase and using the proceeds to purchase other Unit Investment Trusts or Closed-End Funds, often with sales load fees as high as 4 and 5%.</p>
<p>In addition, FINRA reportedly found that SunTrust failed to ensure that eligible   customers received the maximum sales charge discount on UIT purchases   and lacked adequate systems and procedures for monitoring and   supervising UIT, CEF and margin transactions.</p>
<p>In settling this matter, SunTrust Investment Services neither admitted nor denied the    charges, but consented to the entry of FINRA&#8217;s findings.</p>
<p><span style="color: #ff0000;"><strong>If  You Lost Money I<span style="color: #ff0000;">n Any </span></strong></span><strong><span style="color: #ff0000;">SunTrust Investment Services Investment, or Brokerage Account and Believe<span style="color: #ff0000;"> </span></span></strong><span style="color: #ff0000;"><strong>SunTrust Investment Services</strong></span><strong><span style="color: #ff0000;"> </span></strong><strong><span style="color: #ff0000;">May Be To  Blame For Your Losses, Contact A Securities Arbitration Attorney and Broker Fraud Lawyer:</span><br />
</strong></p>
<p><strong><a title="Report &amp; Recover SunTrust Investment Services Investment or Brokerage Account Losses" href="http://yoursecuritiesarbitrationlawyer.com/report-your-broker/" target="_self">-Recover SunTrust Investment Services Brokerage Account Losses-</a></strong></p>
<p><span style="color: #808000;">Fill  Out  The Form On The Right For A Free Attorney Review.</span></p>
<p><span style="color: #999999;">If You Have Thoughts A<span style="color: #999999;">bout </span></span><span style="color: #999999;">SunTrust Investment Services<strong></strong>, Share Your SunTrust Investment Services<strong> </strong>Securities &amp; Investment Comments With Others Below.</span></p>
<p><a href="http://yoursecuritiesarbitrationlawyer.com/suntrust-investment-services-ordered-to-pay-1-4-million-for-alleged-unsuitable-closed-end-fund-and-mutual-fund-transactions/">SunTrust Investment Services Ordered To Pay $1.4 Million For Alleged Unsuitable Closed-End Fund and Mutual Fund Transactions</a> is a post from: <a href="http://yoursecuritiesarbitrationlawyer.com">YourSecuritiesArbitrationLawyer.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://yoursecuritiesarbitrationlawyer.com/suntrust-investment-services-ordered-to-pay-1-4-million-for-alleged-unsuitable-closed-end-fund-and-mutual-fund-transactions/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Phoenix Derivatives Group &amp; Eight Brokers Fined $4.3 Million Over Alleged Improper Communications About Customers&#8217; Interdealer Brokerage Rate Negotiations</title>
		<link>http://yoursecuritiesarbitrationlawyer.com/phoenix-derivatives-group-eight-brokers-fined-4-3-million-over-alleged-improper-communications-about-customers-interdealer-brokerage-rate-negotiations/</link>
		<comments>http://yoursecuritiesarbitrationlawyer.com/phoenix-derivatives-group-eight-brokers-fined-4-3-million-over-alleged-improper-communications-about-customers-interdealer-brokerage-rate-negotiations/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jul 2010 00:50:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Brokers & Brokerage Firms In The News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[arbitration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[arbitrations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[attorney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[attorneys]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[broker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[brokerage firm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[brokerage firms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[brokerage rate reduction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[brokerage rate reductions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[brokers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CDS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[claim]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[claims]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[complaint]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[complaints]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[compliants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[credit default swap]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[default swap]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fined]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[interdealer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lawyer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lawyers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Phoenix Derivatives Group]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Phoenix Derivatives Group LLC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rate reduction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rate reductions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[securities arbitration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[settlement]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://yoursecuritiesarbitrationlawyer.com/?p=1053</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Phoenix Derivatives Group and Eight Brokers Ordered To Pay $4.3 Million By FINRA for Allegedly Engaging In Improper Communications About Customers&#8217; Interdealer Brokerage Rate Negotiations in the Wholesale Credit Default Swap (CDS) Market. The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) has issued an order imposing fines on Phoenix Derivatives Group, LLC of New York and eight [...]<p><a href="http://yoursecuritiesarbitrationlawyer.com/phoenix-derivatives-group-eight-brokers-fined-4-3-million-over-alleged-improper-communications-about-customers-interdealer-brokerage-rate-negotiations/">Phoenix Derivatives Group &#038; Eight Brokers Fined $4.3 Million Over Alleged Improper Communications About Customers&#8217; Interdealer Brokerage Rate Negotiations</a> is a post from: <a href="http://yoursecuritiesarbitrationlawyer.com">YourSecuritiesArbitrationLawyer.com</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p><span style="color: #ff0000;"><strong>Phoenix Derivatives Group and Eight Brokers Ordered To Pay </strong><strong>$4.3 Million By  FINRA</strong></span><strong><span style="color: #ff0000;"><span style="color: #ff0000;"> for Allegedly Engaging In Improper </span></span><span style="color: #ff0000;">Communications About Customers&#8217; Interdealer Brokerage Rate Negotiations</span></strong><strong><span style="color: #ff0000;"><span style="color: #ff0000;"> </span> </span><span style="color: #ff0000;">in the Wholesale Credit Default Swap (CDS) Market.</span></strong></p>
<p>The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) has issued an order imposing fines on Phoenix Derivatives Group, LLC of New York and eight brokers – three employed at  Phoenix and five at four other interdealer brokerage firms – for improper  communications about customers&#8217; proposed brokerage rate reductions in the  wholesale credit default swap (CDS) market, according to a June 24, 2010 FINRA securities &amp; investment  regulatory press release.</p>
<p>FINRA reportedly found that the brokers engaged in communications with personnel at  other interdealer brokerage firms that improperly attempted to influence those  firms and individuals, including communications regarding reactions to customers&#8217; proposed rate  reductions and statements concerning actual or contemplated interdealer broker  responses or counter-positions to the customers&#8217; proposed rate reductions and/or discussions about creating identical, or similar, individual counter-proposals  to rate reduction requests.</p>
<p>Phoenix Derivatives Group was fined $3 million (of which $900,000 is a joint and several fine apportioned among the three CDS  desk co-heads).  In addition to Phoenix and its desk co-heads, five brokers at other  interdealer firms in the CDS market were reportedly fined a total of $1.3 million and  issued suspensions by FINRA:</p>
<ul>
<li>Thomas J. Lewis and Matthew A. Somers, former brokers and co-managers for  the CDS desk at Chapdelaine Corporate Securities &amp; Co., of New York, were  each fined $350,000 and suspended from working in the securities industry in all  capacities for six months and three months, respectively.</li>
<li>John P. Tompkins, a former broker and manager of the CDS desk at CreditTrade  (US) Corp., of New York, was fined $100,000 and suspended in all capacities for  four months.</li>
<li>Michael B. Jessop, a former broker and co-manager of the CDS desk at Tullett  Liberty Inc., of New York, was fined $250,000 and suspended in all capacities  for two months.</li>
<li>Eric Ridder, a former broker for Creditex Group, Inc., of New York, was  fined $250,000 and suspended in all capacities for two months.</li>
</ul>
<p>In settling this matter, Phoenix Derivatives Group and the eight brokers neither admitted nor denied the    charges, but consented to the entry of FINRA&#8217;s findings.</p>
<p><span style="color: #ff0000;"><strong>If  You Lost Money I<span style="color: #ff0000;">n Any </span></strong></span><strong><span style="color: #ff0000;">Phoenix Derivatives Group Investment, or Brokerage Account and Believe Phoenix Derivatives Group </span></strong><strong><span style="color: #ff0000;">May Be To  Blame For Your Losses, Contact A Securities Arbitration Attorney and Broker Fraud Lawyer:</span><br />
</strong></p>
<p><strong><a title="Report &amp; Recover Phoenix Derivatives Group Investment or Brokerage Account Losses" href="http://yoursecuritiesarbitrationlawyer.com/report-your-broker/" target="_self">-Recover Phoenix Derivatives Group Brokerage Account Losses-</a></strong></p>
<p><span style="color: #808000;">Fill  Out  The Form On The Right For A Free Attorney Review.</span></p>
<p><span style="color: #999999;">If You Have Thoughts About </span><span style="color: #999999;">Phoenix Derivatives Group, Share Your Phoenix Derivatives Group</span><span style="color: #999999;"> Securities &amp; Investment Comments With Others Below.</span></p>
<p><a href="http://yoursecuritiesarbitrationlawyer.com/phoenix-derivatives-group-eight-brokers-fined-4-3-million-over-alleged-improper-communications-about-customers-interdealer-brokerage-rate-negotiations/">Phoenix Derivatives Group &#038; Eight Brokers Fined $4.3 Million Over Alleged Improper Communications About Customers&#8217; Interdealer Brokerage Rate Negotiations</a> is a post from: <a href="http://yoursecuritiesarbitrationlawyer.com">YourSecuritiesArbitrationLawyer.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://yoursecuritiesarbitrationlawyer.com/phoenix-derivatives-group-eight-brokers-fined-4-3-million-over-alleged-improper-communications-about-customers-interdealer-brokerage-rate-negotiations/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Piper Jaffray Censured &amp; Fined $700,000 For Alleged Email Retention Violations</title>
		<link>http://yoursecuritiesarbitrationlawyer.com/piper-jaffray-censured-fined-700000-for-alleged-email-retention-violations/</link>
		<comments>http://yoursecuritiesarbitrationlawyer.com/piper-jaffray-censured-fined-700000-for-alleged-email-retention-violations/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jun 2010 02:04:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Brokers & Brokerage Firms In The News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[arbitration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[attorney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[attorneys]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[censure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[censured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[claim]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[claims]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[complaint]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[complaints]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[email]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fined]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lawyer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lawyers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Piper Jaffray]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Piper Jaffray & Co.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[retention]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sanction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[securities law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[settle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[settlement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[violation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[violations]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://yoursecuritiesarbitrationlawyer.com/?p=1045</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Piper Jaffray Ordered To Pay $700,000 By FINRA for Allegedly Failing to Retain Emails In Violation Of Federal Securities Law And NYSE, NASD and FINRA Rules. The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) has issued an order requiring Piper Jaffray &#38; Co. to pay a monetary fine of $700,000 for violations related to its alleged failure [...]<p><a href="http://yoursecuritiesarbitrationlawyer.com/piper-jaffray-censured-fined-700000-for-alleged-email-retention-violations/">Piper Jaffray Censured &#038; Fined $700,000 For Alleged Email Retention Violations</a> is a post from: <a href="http://yoursecuritiesarbitrationlawyer.com">YourSecuritiesArbitrationLawyer.com</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p><span style="color: #ff0000;"><strong>Piper Jaffray </strong></span><span style="color: #ff0000;"><strong>Ordered To P<span style="color: #ff0000;">ay </span></strong></span><strong><span style="color: #ff0000;">$700,000 </span></strong><span style="color: #ff0000;"><strong>By  FINRA</strong></span><strong><span style="color: #ff0000;"> for Allegedly Failing to Retain Emails In Violation Of Federal Securities Law And NYSE, NASD and FINRA Rules.<br />
</span></strong></p>
<p>The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) has issued an order requiring Piper Jaffray &amp; Co. to pay a monetary fine of $700,000 for violations  related to its alleged failure to retain approximately 4.3 million emails from  November 2002 through December 2008, according to a May 24, 2010 FINRA securities &amp; investment  regulatory press release.</p>
<p>Piper Jaffray also reportedly failed to disclose its email  retention and  retrieval issues to  FINRA, which may have affected Piper Jaffray&#8217;s ability to   comply with email extraction requests from  FINRA or to respond to  email  requests  from other regulators or from parties in civil litigation  or   arbitrations.  Piper Jaffray also agreed to a censure.</p>
<p>In settling this matter, Piper Jaffray neither admitted nor denied the    charges, but consented to the entry of FINRA&#8217;s findings.</p>
<p>In <em>U.S. Bancorp Piper Jaffray Inc.</em>, Case No. 02-227 (NYSE Hearing Board November 15, 2002) Piper Jaffray was previously disciplined for violations regarding its alleged failure to preserve electronic email communications as required by NYSE &amp; NASD Rules and federal securities laws.  In that case, Piper Jaffray reportedly consented to a censure and sanction of $1,650,000 by the Securities &amp; Exchange Commission, New  York Stock Exchange and NASD arising from investigations of Piper Jaffray&#8217;s alleged conflicts of interest between its investment banking and research  departments.</p>
<p>For more information on Piper Jaffray&#8217;s settlement of alleged rule violations, read Piper Jaffray&#8217;s financial regulatory authority <a title="Piper Jaffray &amp; Co. FINRA Letter of Acceptance, Waiver and Consent Re Emails" href="http://www.finra.org/web/groups/industry/@ip/@enf/@ad/documents/industry/p121505.pdf" target="_blank">letter of acceptance, waiver and consent</a>, No. 20090197795.</p>
<p><span style="color: #ff0000;"><strong>If  You Lost Money In Any<span style="color: #ff0000;"> </span></strong></span><strong><span style="color: #ff0000;">Piper Jaffray Investment, Retirement or Brokerage Account and Believe Piper Jaffray </span></strong><strong><span style="color: #ff0000;">May Be To  Blame For Your Losses, Contact A Securities Arbitration Attorney and Stock Broker Fraud Lawyer:</span><br />
</strong></p>
<p><strong><a title="Report &amp; Recover Piper Jaffray Retirement, Investment or Brokerage Account Losses" href="http://yoursecuritiesarbitrationlawyer.com/report-your-broker/" target="_self">-Recover Piper Jaffray Brokerage Account Losses-</a></strong></p>
<p><span style="color: #808000;">Fill  Out  The Form On The Right For A Free Attorney Review.</span></p>
<p><span style="color: #999999;">If You Have Thoughts About Piper Jaffray Settlement, Share Your Piper Jaffray Securities &amp; Investment Comments With Others Below.</span></p>
<p><a href="http://yoursecuritiesarbitrationlawyer.com/piper-jaffray-censured-fined-700000-for-alleged-email-retention-violations/">Piper Jaffray Censured &#038; Fined $700,000 For Alleged Email Retention Violations</a> is a post from: <a href="http://yoursecuritiesarbitrationlawyer.com">YourSecuritiesArbitrationLawyer.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://yoursecuritiesarbitrationlawyer.com/piper-jaffray-censured-fined-700000-for-alleged-email-retention-violations/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Citigroup Global Markets Sanctioned $1.5 Million For Alleged Supervisory Violations Relating to Cemetary Trust Funds</title>
		<link>http://yoursecuritiesarbitrationlawyer.com/citigroup-global-markets-sanctioned-1-5-million-for-alleged-supervisory-violations-relating-to-cemetary-trust-funds/</link>
		<comments>http://yoursecuritiesarbitrationlawyer.com/citigroup-global-markets-sanctioned-1-5-million-for-alleged-supervisory-violations-relating-to-cemetary-trust-funds/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 May 2010 21:33:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Brokers & Brokerage Firms In The News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[arbitration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[attorney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[attorneys]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Citigroup]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Citigroup Global Markets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[claim]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[claims]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[commissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[complaint]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[complaints]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[disgorge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[disgorgement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[failure to supervise]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fined]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lawsuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lawsuite]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lawsuits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lawyer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[misappropriate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[misappropriated]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sanction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sanctioned]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[securities arbitration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[securities fraud arbitration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[supervise]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trust fund]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trust funds]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://yoursecuritiesarbitrationlawyer.com/?p=997</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Citigroup Global Markets Ordered By FINRA To Pay $1,500,000 for Allegedly Failing to Supervise Handling Of Trust Funds Belonging To Cemeteries In Michigan and Tennessee . The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) has issued an order requiring Citigroup Global Markets, Inc. to pay a monetary sanction of $1.5 million (a $750,000 fine and disgorgement of [...]<p><a href="http://yoursecuritiesarbitrationlawyer.com/citigroup-global-markets-sanctioned-1-5-million-for-alleged-supervisory-violations-relating-to-cemetary-trust-funds/">Citigroup Global Markets Sanctioned $1.5 Million For Alleged Supervisory Violations Relating to Cemetary Trust Funds</a> is a post from: <a href="http://yoursecuritiesarbitrationlawyer.com">YourSecuritiesArbitrationLawyer.com</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p><span style="color: #ff0000;"><strong>Citigroup Global Markets </strong></span><span style="color: #ff0000;"><strong>Ordered By FINRA To P<span style="color: #ff0000;">ay </span></strong></span><strong><span style="color: #ff0000;">$1,500,000 for Allegedly Failing to Supervise Handling Of Trust Funds Belonging To Cemeteries In Michigan and Tennessee .</span></strong></p>
<p>The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) has issued an order requiring Citigroup Global Markets, Inc. to pay a monetary sanction of $1.5 million (a $750,000 fine and disgorgement of $750,000 in commissions) for supervisory failures relating to its handling of trust funds belonging to cemeteries in Michigan and  Tennessee, according to a May 26, 2010 FINRA securities &amp; investment regulatory press release.</p>
<p>FINRA reportedly found that from September 2004 through October 2006,  Citigroup broker Mark Singer and two of his customers were involved in a scheme  to misappropriate an amount alleged in various legal actions to be over $60  million in cemetery trust funds.</p>
<p>FINRA&#8217;s investigation reportedly showed that Citigroup Global Markets failed to reasonably supervise the handling of these accounts by  inadequately responding to a succession of &#8220;red flags,&#8221; failures that permitted  the scheme to continue undetected until October 2006.  In settling these matters, Citigroup Global Markets reportedly neither admitted nor denied the charges,  but consented to the entry of FINRA&#8217;s findings.</p>
<p><span style="color: #ff0000;"><strong>If  You Lost Money In Any<span style="color: #ff0000;"> </span></strong></span><span style="color: #ff0000;"><strong>Citigroup Global Markets I</strong></span><span style="color: #ff0000;"><strong>nvestment, Retirement or Brokerage Account and Believ<span style="color: #ff0000;">e </span></strong></span><strong><span style="color: #ff0000;">Citigroup Global Markets </span></strong><strong><span style="color: #ff0000;">May Be To  Blame For Your Losses, Contact A Securities Arbitration Attorney and Stock Broker Fraud Lawyer:</span><br />
</strong></p>
<p><strong><a title="Report &amp; Recover Citigroup Global Markets Retirement, Investment or Brokerage Account Losses" href="http://yoursecuritiesarbitrationlawyer.com/report-your-broker/" target="_self">-Recover Citigroup Global Markets Brokerage Account Losses-</a></strong></p>
<p><span style="color: #808000;">Fill  Out  The Form On The Right For A Free Attorney Review.</span></p>
<p><span style="color: #999999;">If You Have Thoughts About </span><span style="color: #999999;">Citigroup Global Markets</span><span style="color: #999999;">, Share Your Citigroup Global Markets </span><span style="color: #999999;">Securities &amp; Investment Comments With Others Below.</span></p>
<p><a href="http://yoursecuritiesarbitrationlawyer.com/citigroup-global-markets-sanctioned-1-5-million-for-alleged-supervisory-violations-relating-to-cemetary-trust-funds/">Citigroup Global Markets Sanctioned $1.5 Million For Alleged Supervisory Violations Relating to Cemetary Trust Funds</a> is a post from: <a href="http://yoursecuritiesarbitrationlawyer.com">YourSecuritiesArbitrationLawyer.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://yoursecuritiesarbitrationlawyer.com/citigroup-global-markets-sanctioned-1-5-million-for-alleged-supervisory-violations-relating-to-cemetary-trust-funds/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Former John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance Company &amp; ING Financial Partners Broker Michael J. DiMare Barred For Allegedly Selling Phony Financial Products</title>
		<link>http://yoursecuritiesarbitrationlawyer.com/former-john-hancock-mutual-life-insurance-company-ing-financial-partners-broker-michael-j-dimare-barred-for-allegedly-selling-phony-financial-products/</link>
		<comments>http://yoursecuritiesarbitrationlawyer.com/former-john-hancock-mutual-life-insurance-company-ing-financial-partners-broker-michael-j-dimare-barred-for-allegedly-selling-phony-financial-products/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 May 2010 09:21:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Brokers & Brokerage Firms In The News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[attorneys]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[claim]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[claims]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[complaint]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[complaints]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[compliants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[financial adviser]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[financial advisor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[financial advisors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[investment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[investment attorney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[investment attorneys]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[investment consultant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[investment consultants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[investment lawyer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[investment lawyers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[investor protection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lawyer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lawyers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[securities arbitration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[securities arbitration attorney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[securities attorney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[securities attorneys]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[securities fraud lawyer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[securities lawyer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[securities lawyers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stock broker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stock broker attorney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stock brokers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stock lawyer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stockbroker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stockbrokers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://yoursecuritiesarbitrationlawyer.com/?p=925</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Former John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance Company and ING Financial Partners Florida Broker Barred By FINRA For The Alleged Sale Of Fictitious CDs and Bonds. The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) has permanently barred a former Florida John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance Company and ING Financial Partners, Inc. broker, Michael J. DiMare, from the securities [...]<p><a href="http://yoursecuritiesarbitrationlawyer.com/former-john-hancock-mutual-life-insurance-company-ing-financial-partners-broker-michael-j-dimare-barred-for-allegedly-selling-phony-financial-products/">Former John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance Company &#038; ING Financial Partners Broker Michael J. DiMare Barred For Allegedly Selling Phony Financial Products</a> is a post from: <a href="http://yoursecuritiesarbitrationlawyer.com">YourSecuritiesArbitrationLawyer.com</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p><strong><span style="color: #ff0000;">Former John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance Company and </span><span style="color: #ff0000;">ING Financial Partners </span></strong><strong><span style="color: #ff0000;">Florida Broker Barred By FINRA For The Alleged Sale Of Fictitious CDs and Bonds.<br />
</span></strong></p>
<p>The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) has permanently barred a former Florida John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance Company and ING Financial Partners, Inc. broker, Michael J. DiMare, from the securities industry for allegedly misappropriating over $1.9 million in brokerage client funds and making false statements and sending falsified brokerage  account statements and other documents to customers to  hide the scheme, according to a May 11, 2010 FINRA securities &amp; investment regulatory press release.</p>
<p>From at least 2001 to 2008, the broker reportedly persuaded investors to invest in fictitious tax-free corporate bonds and CDs.  Between 2001 and 2006,  the broker was reportedly employed as a sales manager with John Hancock Mutual Life  Insurance Company and between October 2006 and May 2008, the broker was reportedly  registered as a registered representative/insurance agent with ING  Financial Partners, Inc.</p>
<p>According to FINRA, John Hancock Mutual Life  Insurance Company and ING  Financial Partners customers whose funds were misappropriated or converted were  reimbursed by John Hancock and ING.</p>
<p><span style="color: #ff0000;"><strong>If  You Lost Money In Any </strong></span><span style="color: #ff0000;"><strong>John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance Company or ING Financial Partners</strong></span> <span style="color: #ff0000;"><strong>Investment, Retirement or Brokerage Account and Believe </strong></span><span style="color: #ff0000;"><strong>John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance Company or ING Financial Partners </strong><strong></strong></span><strong><span style="color: #ff0000;">May Be To  Blame For Your Losses, Contact A Stock Broker Fraud Lawyer &amp; Securities Arbitration Attorney.</span><br />
</strong></p>
<p><strong><a title="Report &amp; Recover John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance Company and ING Financial Partners Retirement, Investment or Brokerage Account Losses" href="http://yoursecuritiesarbitrationlawyer.com/report-your-broker/" target="_self">-Report &amp; Recover John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance Company Or ING Financial Partners Brokerage Account Losses-</a></strong></p>
<p><span style="color: #808000;">Fill  Out  The Form On The Right For A Free Attorney Review.</span></p>
<p><span style="color: #999999;">If You Have Thoughts About The </span><span style="color: #999999;">Former John Hancock Mutual Life  Insurance Company and ING  Financial Partners</span><span style="color: #999999;"> Broker Barred By FINRA, Share Your Securities &amp; Investment Comments With Others Below.</span></p>
<p><a href="http://yoursecuritiesarbitrationlawyer.com/former-john-hancock-mutual-life-insurance-company-ing-financial-partners-broker-michael-j-dimare-barred-for-allegedly-selling-phony-financial-products/">Former John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance Company &#038; ING Financial Partners Broker Michael J. DiMare Barred For Allegedly Selling Phony Financial Products</a> is a post from: <a href="http://yoursecuritiesarbitrationlawyer.com">YourSecuritiesArbitrationLawyer.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://yoursecuritiesarbitrationlawyer.com/former-john-hancock-mutual-life-insurance-company-ing-financial-partners-broker-michael-j-dimare-barred-for-allegedly-selling-phony-financial-products/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Westpark Capital Ordered To Pay $400,000 For Allegedly Failing to Supervise Brokers</title>
		<link>http://yoursecuritiesarbitrationlawyer.com/westpark-capital-ordered-to-pay-400000-for-allegedly-failing-to-supervise-brokers/</link>
		<comments>http://yoursecuritiesarbitrationlawyer.com/westpark-capital-ordered-to-pay-400000-for-allegedly-failing-to-supervise-brokers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 May 2010 17:29:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Brokers & Brokerage Firms In The News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[arbitration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[arbitrations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[attorney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[attorneys]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[broker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[brokerage firm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[brokers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[churn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[churned]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[churning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[claim]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[claims]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[complaint]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[complaints]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[compliants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Customer Complaint]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Customer Complaints]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[excessive trading]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Failing to Supervise]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[failure to supervise]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[financial adviser]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[financial advisor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[financial advisors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fined]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[investment consultant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[investment consultants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lawyer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lawyers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[margin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[restitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[settle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[settled]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[settlement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[settlements]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stock broker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stock brokers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stockbrokers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unauthorized trading]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unsuitability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unsuitable]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Westpark Capital]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://yoursecuritiesarbitrationlawyer.com/?p=949</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Westpark Capital Ordered By FINRA To Pay $400,000 for Allegedly Failing to Supervise Brokers With Disciplinary Histories &#38; Customer Complaints Who Churned Accounts, Engaged in Unauthorized, Excessive &#38; Unsuitable Trading. The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) has issued an order requiring Westpark Capital, Inc. to pay a total of $400,000 (a $100,000 fine and $300,000 [...]<p><a href="http://yoursecuritiesarbitrationlawyer.com/westpark-capital-ordered-to-pay-400000-for-allegedly-failing-to-supervise-brokers/">Westpark Capital Ordered To Pay $400,000 For Allegedly Failing to Supervise Brokers</a> is a post from: <a href="http://yoursecuritiesarbitrationlawyer.com">YourSecuritiesArbitrationLawyer.com</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p><span style="color: #ff0000;"><strong>Westpark Capital Ordered By FINRA To P<span style="color: #ff0000;">ay </span></strong></span><strong><span style="color: #ff0000;">$400,000 for Allegedly Failing to Supervise Brokers With Disciplinary Histories &amp; Customer Complaints Who Churned Accounts, Engaged in  Unauthorized, Excessive &amp; Unsuitable Trading.</span></strong></p>
<p>The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) has issued an order requiring Westpark Capital, Inc. to pay a total of $400,000 (a $100,000 fine and $300,000 in restitution  to affected Westpark Capital customers) for supervisory system failures and   suspended two officers for failing to supervise Westpark Capital brokers who churned customer accounts and  engaged in unauthorized and  unsuitable trading in accounts in two now-closed Long Island branches, according to a May 6, 2010 FINRA securities &amp; investment regulatory press release.</p>
<p>FINRA reportedly found that  between February 2006 and July 2007, Westpark Capital failed to establish and  maintain an adequate system for supervising its brokers.  In concluding the settled proceedings, Westpark Capital neither admitted nor denied the charges, but consented to  the entry of FINRA&#8217;s findings.</p>
<p><span style="color: #ff0000;"><strong>If  You Lost Money In Any<span style="color: #ff0000;"> </span></strong></span><span style="color: #ff0000;"><strong>Westpark  Capital</strong></span><strong><span style="color: #ff0000;"> </span></strong><span style="color: #ff0000;"><strong><span style="color: #ff0000;"> </span>Investment, Retirement or Brokerage Account and Believe </strong></span><span style="color: #ff0000;"><strong>Westpark   Capital</strong><strong> </strong></span><strong><span style="color: #ff0000;"><span style="color: #ff0000;"> </span>May Be To  Blame For Your Losses, Contact A Stock Broker Lawyer &amp; Securities Arbitration Attorney.</span><br />
</strong></p>
<p><strong><a title="Report &amp; Recover Westpark Capital Retirement, Investment or Brokerage Account Losses" href="http://yoursecuritiesarbitrationlawyer.com/report-your-broker/" target="_self">-Report &amp; Recover Westpark Capital Brokerage Account Losses-</a></strong></p>
<p><span style="color: #808000;">Fill  Out  The Form On The Right For A Free Attorney Review.</span></p>
<p><span style="color: #999999;">If You Have Thoughts About </span><span style="color: #999999;">Westpark   Capital</span><span style="color: #999999;"><strong></strong>, Share Your </span><span style="color: #999999;">Westpark    Capital<strong> </strong></span><span style="color: #999999;">Securities &amp; Investment Comments With Others Below.</span></p>
<p><a href="http://yoursecuritiesarbitrationlawyer.com/westpark-capital-ordered-to-pay-400000-for-allegedly-failing-to-supervise-brokers/">Westpark Capital Ordered To Pay $400,000 For Allegedly Failing to Supervise Brokers</a> is a post from: <a href="http://yoursecuritiesarbitrationlawyer.com">YourSecuritiesArbitrationLawyer.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://yoursecuritiesarbitrationlawyer.com/westpark-capital-ordered-to-pay-400000-for-allegedly-failing-to-supervise-brokers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Deutsche Bank Securities &amp; National Financial Services Fined For Alleged Short Sale Violations</title>
		<link>http://yoursecuritiesarbitrationlawyer.com/deutsche-bank-securities-national-financial-services-fined-for-alleged-short-sale-violations/</link>
		<comments>http://yoursecuritiesarbitrationlawyer.com/deutsche-bank-securities-national-financial-services-fined-for-alleged-short-sale-violations/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 May 2010 05:37:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Brokers & Brokerage Firms In The News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[attorney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[attorneys]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[borrow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[borrowed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[broker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[broker-dealer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[broker-dealers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[claim]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[claims]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[complaint]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[complaints]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[compliants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dealer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Deutsche Bank Securities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Direct Market Access]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[financial adviser]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[financial advisor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[financial advisors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fined]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FINRA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[investment attorney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[investment attorneys]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[investment consultant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[investment consultants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[investment lawyer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[investor protection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Locate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Locates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Financial Services]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regulation SHO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[securities arbitration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[securities arbitration attorney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[securities attorney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[securities attorneys]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[securities fraud lawyer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[securities lawyer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[securities lawyers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SHO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[short]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[short sale]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[short sale orders]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[short sales]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shorts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stock broker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stock broker attorney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stock lawyer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stockbroker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stockbrokers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://yoursecuritiesarbitrationlawyer.com/?p=910</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Deutsche Bank Securities &#38; National Financial Services Receive Fines For Allegedly Facilitating Customer Execution of Short Sales Through Direct Market Access Order Systems That Violated the &#8216;Locate&#8217; Requirement of Regulation SHO The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) has fined two broker-dealers, Deutsche Bank Securities &#38; National Financial Services, a total of $925,000 (Deutsche Bank Securities [...]<p><a href="http://yoursecuritiesarbitrationlawyer.com/deutsche-bank-securities-national-financial-services-fined-for-alleged-short-sale-violations/">Deutsche Bank Securities &#038; National Financial Services Fined For Alleged Short Sale Violations</a> is a post from: <a href="http://yoursecuritiesarbitrationlawyer.com">YourSecuritiesArbitrationLawyer.com</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p><span style="color: #ff0000;"><strong>Deutsche Bank Securities &amp; National Financial Services Receive Fines</strong></span><strong><span style="color: #ff0000;"> For Allegedly </span></strong><span style="color: #ff0000;"><strong>Facilitating Customer Execution of Short Sales Through Direct Market  Access Order Systems That Violated the &#8216;Locate&#8217; Requirement of  Regulation SHO</strong></span></p>
<p>The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) has fined two broker-dealers, Deutsche Bank Securities &amp; National Financial Services, a total of $925,000 (Deutsche Bank Securities was fined  $575,000 and National Financial Services (NFS) was fined $350,000) for executing  short sale orders in violation of Regulation SHO and related  supervisory violations, according to a May 13, 2010 FINRA securities &amp; investment regulatory press release.</p>
<p>Regulation SHO reportedly prohibits a broker or dealer from accepting or effecting  a short sale order in an equity security without reasonable grounds to  believe that the security can be borrowed, so that it can be delivered  on the date delivery is due.  A broker or dealer is required to identify and document a source (referred to as a Locate or Locates) from which to borrow  such security prior to  effecting a short sale.</p>
<p>FINRA&#8217;s review of a sample of short sale orders at Deutsche Bank Securities &amp; National Financial Services reportedly revealed  that some short sale orders entered through the Deutsche Bank Securities &amp; National Financial Services Direct Market Access  trading systems were released for execution without evidence that a  locate had actually been obtained.</p>
<p><span style="color: #ff0000;"><strong>If  You Lost Money In Any </strong></span><strong><span style="color: #ff0000;">Deutsche Bank Securities Or National Financial Services</span></strong><span style="color: #ff0000;"><strong><span style="color: #ff0000;"> </span>Investment, Retirement or Brokerage Account and Believe </strong></span><span style="color: #ff0000;"><strong>Deutsche  Bank Securities Or National Financial Services</strong><strong> </strong></span><strong><span style="color: #ff0000;"> May Be To  Blame For Your Losses, Contact A Stock Broker Lawyer &amp; Securities Arbitration Attorney.</span><br />
</strong></p>
<p><strong><a title="Report &amp; Recover Deutsche Bank Securities Or National Financial Services Retirement, Investment or Brokerage Account Losses" href="http://yoursecuritiesarbitrationlawyer.com/report-your-broker/" target="_self">-Report &amp; Recover Deutsche Bank Securities Or National Financial Services Brokerage Account Losses-</a></strong></p>
<p><span style="color: #808000;">Fill  Out  The Form On The Right For A Free Attorney Review.</span></p>
<p><span style="color: #999999;">If You Have Thoughts About The Deutsche Bank Securities &amp; National Financial Services FINRA Fines, Share Your Securities &amp; Investment Comments With Others Below.</span></p>
<p><a href="http://yoursecuritiesarbitrationlawyer.com/deutsche-bank-securities-national-financial-services-fined-for-alleged-short-sale-violations/">Deutsche Bank Securities &#038; National Financial Services Fined For Alleged Short Sale Violations</a> is a post from: <a href="http://yoursecuritiesarbitrationlawyer.com">YourSecuritiesArbitrationLawyer.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://yoursecuritiesarbitrationlawyer.com/deutsche-bank-securities-national-financial-services-fined-for-alleged-short-sale-violations/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>RBC Capital Markets, Fagenson &amp; Co., Alpine Securities, Equity Station &amp; Olympus Securities Fined for Sale of Unregistered Securities, Including Universal Express Penny Stock</title>
		<link>http://yoursecuritiesarbitrationlawyer.com/rbc-capital-markets-fagenson-co-alpine-securities-equity-station-olympus-securities-fined-for-sale-of-unregistered-securities-including-universal-express-penny-stock/</link>
		<comments>http://yoursecuritiesarbitrationlawyer.com/rbc-capital-markets-fagenson-co-alpine-securities-equity-station-olympus-securities-fined-for-sale-of-unregistered-securities-including-universal-express-penny-stock/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 May 2010 04:26:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Brokers & Brokerage Firms In The News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1933 Securities Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alpine Securities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[attorney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[attorneys]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[claim]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[claims]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[complaint]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[complaints]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[compliants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Equity Station]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fagenson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fagenson & Co.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Financial Industry Regulatory Authority or FINRA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fined]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[illegal stock distribution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[illegal stock distributions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[laws]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lawyer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lawyers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NASD Rule 2110]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Olympus Securities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[penny stock]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[penny stocks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RBC Capital Markets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RBC Capital Markets Corporation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[registration requirements]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[settle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[settled]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[settlement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[settles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Universal Express]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Universal Express Inc.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unregistered]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unregistered penny stock]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unregistered penny stocks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unregistered stock]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unregistered stocks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://yoursecuritiesarbitrationlawyer.com/?p=846</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[RBC Capital Markets Corporation, Fagenson &#38; Co., Alpine Securities Corp., Equity Station and Olympus Securities Fined $385,000 By FINRA For Sale 8 Billion Shares of Unregistered Penny Stocks, Including Universal Express, Inc. The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) has fined five broker-dealers, RBC Capital Markets Corporation, Fagenson &#38; Co., Alpine Securities Corp., Equity Station and [...]<p><a href="http://yoursecuritiesarbitrationlawyer.com/rbc-capital-markets-fagenson-co-alpine-securities-equity-station-olympus-securities-fined-for-sale-of-unregistered-securities-including-universal-express-penny-stock/">RBC Capital Markets, Fagenson &#038; Co., Alpine Securities, Equity Station &#038; Olympus Securities Fined for Sale of Unregistered Securities, Including Universal Express Penny Stock</a> is a post from: <a href="http://yoursecuritiesarbitrationlawyer.com">YourSecuritiesArbitrationLawyer.com</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p><span style="color: #ff0000;"><strong>RBC Capital Markets Corporation, Fagenson &amp; Co., Alpine Securities Corp., Equity Station and Olympus Securities Fined $385,000 By FINRA For Sale 8 Billion Shares of Unregistered Penny Stocks, Including </strong></span><strong><span style="color: #ff0000;">Universal Express, Inc.</span></strong></p>
<p>The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) has fined five broker-dealers, RBC  Capital Markets Corporation, Fagenson &amp; Co., Alpine Securities  Corp., Equity Station and Olympus Securities for allegedly selling billions of shares of Universal Express Inc.&#8217;s unregistered stock and unregistered shares of other penny stocks, according to a FINRA regulatory press release.</p>
<p>Fagenson &amp; Co., RBC  Capital Markets, Alpine Securities, Equity Station and Olympus Securities reportedly failed to take appropriate steps to determine whether the securities  could be sold without violating federal registration requirements, despite purported red flags indicating that illegal stock distributions might have been taking  place.</p>
<p>Fagenson &amp; Co., RBC  Capital Markets, Alpine Securities, Equity  Station and Olympus Securities consented to pay the fines to settle the securities fraud allegations, but neither admitted nor denied the securities fraud charges.</p>
<p>For more information on the RBC  Capital Markets Corporation, Fagenson &amp; Co., Alpine Securities  Corp., Equity Station and Olympus Securities FINRA regulatory action, read the Letters of Acceptance, Waiver and Consent:</p>
<ul>
<li><a title="Fagenson &amp; Co. Action" href="http://www.finra.org/web/groups/industry/@ip/@enf/@ad/documents/industry/p121326.pdf" target="_blank">Fagenson &amp; Co. Action</a></li>
<li><a title="RBC Capital Markets Corporation Action" href="http://www.finra.org/web/groups/industry/@ip/@enf/@ad/documents/industry/p121327.pdf" target="_blank">RBC Capital Markets Corporation Action</a></li>
<li><a title="Alpine Securities Corporation Action" href="http://www.finra.org/web/groups/industry/@ip/@enf/@ad/documents/industry/p121328.pdf" target="_blank">Alpine Securities Corporation Action</a></li>
<li><a title="Equity Station Inc. Action" href="http://www.finra.org/web/groups/industry/@ip/@enf/@ad/documents/industry/p121329.pdf" target="_blank">Equity Station Inc. Action</a></li>
<li><a title="Olympus Securities LLC Action" href="http://www.finra.org/web/groups/industry/@ip/@enf/@ad/documents/industry/p121330.pdf" target="_blank">Olympus Securities, LLC Action</a></li>
</ul>
<p><span style="color: #ff0000;"><strong>If You Lost Money In Your</strong></span> <span style="color: #ff0000;"><strong>RBC  Capital Markets Corporation, Fagenson &amp; Co., Alpine Securities  Corp., Equity Station and Olympus Securities</strong></span><span style="color: #ff0000;"><span style="color: #ff0000;"><strong> </strong></span><strong>Brokerage Account and Believe Your </strong></span><span style="color: #ff0000;"><strong>Stock</strong><strong> Broker, Advisor or Investment Consultant May Be To Blame, Contact A Stock Broker Fraud &amp; Securities Arbitration Attorney.</strong></span></p>
<p><span style="color: #808000;">Fill  Out  The Form On The Right For A Free Attorney Review.</span></p>
<p><strong><a title="Recover Penny Stock Losses" href="../recover-your-losses/" target="_blank"><strong>-Recover Penny Stock Losses-</strong></a></strong></p>
<p><a title="Recover Penny Stock Losses" href="http://yoursecuritiesarbitrationlawyer.com/recover-your-losses/" target="_blank"><strong><span style="color: #0000ff;"> </span></strong></a></p>
<p><span style="color: #808000;">If You Have Thoughts On The RBC  Capital Markets, Fagenson &amp; Co., Alpine Securities , Equity Station and Olympus Securities FINRA Fines, Share Your Comments With Others Below.</span></p>
<p><a href="http://yoursecuritiesarbitrationlawyer.com/rbc-capital-markets-fagenson-co-alpine-securities-equity-station-olympus-securities-fined-for-sale-of-unregistered-securities-including-universal-express-penny-stock/">RBC Capital Markets, Fagenson &#038; Co., Alpine Securities, Equity Station &#038; Olympus Securities Fined for Sale of Unregistered Securities, Including Universal Express Penny Stock</a> is a post from: <a href="http://yoursecuritiesarbitrationlawyer.com">YourSecuritiesArbitrationLawyer.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://yoursecuritiesarbitrationlawyer.com/rbc-capital-markets-fagenson-co-alpine-securities-equity-station-olympus-securities-fined-for-sale-of-unregistered-securities-including-universal-express-penny-stock/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

